Comparison of postoperative pain with thin or thick drainage tubes after lung lobe or lung segment removal
Zusammenfassung der Studie
At the end of a lung surgery where a lung lobe or lung segment has been removed, a tube is inserted into the chest (also known as chest drainage). The tube drains wound fluid and air from the chest. The placement of a large-bore tube (24 F) after lung segment removal is currently considered standard procedure. The tube can cause pain and interfere with the patient's breathing exercises. Therefore, according to current understanding, the tube is removed as soon as it is no longer necessary. The tube is usually removed starting from the first postoperative day. In this study, we want to find out whether patients with a small-bore (16 F) tube in the chest experience less postoperative pain. Additionally, we want to investigate pain relief after early removal of the tube. The postoperative complications in patients with early removal of the tube from the chest will be compared with those in whom the tube was removed starting from the first day after surgery.
(BASEC)
Untersuchte Intervention
The study intervention being investigated is the placement of a chest drain with a thin tube following lung surgery. Depending on randomization, either a small-bore (16 F) or a large-bore (24 F) tube will be inserted.
Postoperatively, the intensity of chest pain in the surgical area will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), which is provided to the patient on a sheet of paper. The visual analog scale is a widely recognized scale.
Chest pain intensity will be measured and documented at rest and during coughing. The patient marks their responses with a vertical line on the horizontal marking line of the sheet. The evaluation is done by measuring the distance from the starting anchor point (0) to the marking; the recorded values are documented in millimeters (0-100). Assessment will take place 2, 4, 6 hours after the end of the operation and then daily between 7–8 AM and 5–6 PM until the third day or until the tube is removed.
(BASEC)
Untersuchte Krankheit(en)
Resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lung metastases. Lung changes with suspicion of a malignant disease.
(BASEC)
Resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lung metastases. Lung changes with suspicion of a malignant disease. Thoracoscopic (=keyhole surgery) anatomical lung segment removal under general anesthesia. (BASEC)
Ausschlusskriterien
Previous chest surgeries on the same side within 6 months. Chronic pain. Severe heart, liver, and kidney diseases. Bleeding disorders. Nerve diseases. Chest pain (in the surgical area) when coughing of > 10 mm preoperatively. (BASEC)
Studienstandort
Basel
(BASEC)
Sponsor
University Hospital Basel
(BASEC)
Kontakt für weitere Auskünfte zur Studie
Kontaktperson Schweiz
Didier Lardinois
+41 (0)61 328 77 99
didier.lardinois@clutterusb.chUniversity Hospital Basel
(BASEC)
Wissenschaftliche Auskünfte
nicht verfügbar
Name der bewilligenden Ethikkommission (bei multizentrischen Studien nur die Leitkommission)
Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz EKNZ
(BASEC)
Datum der Bewilligung durch die Ethikkommission
16.04.2025
(BASEC)
ICTRP Studien-ID
nicht verfügbar
Offizieller Titel (Genehmigt von der Ethikkommission)
Comparison of 16F versus 24F chest drain after thoracoscopic lobectomy and/or segmentectomy: a monocentre prospective randomized controlled trial. (BASEC)
Wissenschaftlicher Titel
nicht verfügbar
Öffentlicher Titel
nicht verfügbar
Untersuchte Krankheit(en)
nicht verfügbar
Untersuchte Intervention
nicht verfügbar
Studientyp
nicht verfügbar
Studiendesign
nicht verfügbar
Ein-/Ausschlusskriterien
nicht verfügbar
nicht verfügbar
Primäre und sekundäre Endpunkte
nicht verfügbar
nicht verfügbar
Registrierungsdatum
nicht verfügbar
Einschluss des ersten Teilnehmers
nicht verfügbar
Sekundäre Sponsoren
nicht verfügbar
Weitere Kontakte
nicht verfügbar
Sekundäre IDs
nicht verfügbar
Angaben zur Verfügbarkeit von individuellen Teilnehmerdaten
nicht verfügbar
Weitere Informationen zur Studie
nicht verfügbar
Ergebnisse der Studie
Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse
nicht verfügbar
Link zu den Ergebnissen im Primärregister
nicht verfügbar