Aesthetic outcome, clinical performance, patient perception, and cost-time efficiency of implant-supported single crowns under the influence of the prosthetic workflow - a randomized clinical study in the aesthetic zone
Zusammenfassung der Studie
In this study, we compare three different workflows for the creation of the implant reconstruction. We aim to find out which of the three different workflows achieves the best overall aesthetic outcome and the best clinical performance. Furthermore, time and cost expenditure and patient-related outcomes of the three different therapeutic options are compared.
(BASEC)
Untersuchte Intervention
In our study, participants are randomly assigned to 3 groups.
• Group A receives a zirconia healing cap for 2 weeks in the first step. This is followed by a provisional phase with soft tissue conditioning according to the dynamic compression technique for three months. The definitive reconstruction is made from a custom CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia abutment, which is individualized with customized hand-built ceramics.
• Group B receives a titanium healing cap for two weeks, without a subsequent provisional phase. The definitive reconstruction consists of a monolithic ceramic crown, which is individualized through extrinsic coloring and cemented onto a Variobase abutment.
• Group C receives a CAD/CAM-fabricated individual mucosa former made of zirconia for 3 months, without a subsequent provisional phase. The definitive reconstruction is made from a custom CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia abutment, which is individualized with customized hand-built ceramics.
(BASEC)
Untersuchte Krankheit(en)
Implant reconstruction
(BASEC)
1. Participants must have voluntarily signed the informed consent before each study-related procedure. 2. Male and female participants who are at least 18 years old 3. Implant axis compatible with transocclusal screw retention (screw access palatinal to the incisal edges) (BASEC)
Ausschlusskriterien
1. Systemic diseases that would interfere with dental implant therapy (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, i.v. bisphosphonate intake) 2. Local radiation therapy in the head and neck area in the medical history 3. Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes or tobacco equivalents per day or chew tobacco (BASEC)
Studienstandort
Zürich
(BASEC)
Sponsor
Center of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
(BASEC)
Kontakt für weitere Auskünfte zur Studie
Kontaktperson Schweiz
Prof. Dr. Daniel Thoma
+44634 04 04
daniel.thoma@clutterzzm.uzh.chCenter of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
(BASEC)
Allgemeine Auskünfte
Zentrum fr Zahnmedizin, Klinik fr Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin
+41 44 634 43 05
daniel.thoma@clutterzzm.uzh.ch(ICTRP)
Wissenschaftliche Auskünfte
Zentrum f?r Zahnmedizin, Klinik f?r Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin
+41 44 634 43 05
daniel.thoma@clutterzzm.uzh.ch(ICTRP)
Name der bewilligenden Ethikkommission (bei multizentrischen Studien nur die Leitkommission)
Ethikkommission Zürich
(BASEC)
Datum der Bewilligung durch die Ethikkommission
19.06.2023
(BASEC)
ICTRP Studien-ID
DRKS00032124 (ICTRP)
Offizieller Titel (Genehmigt von der Ethikkommission)
Esthetic Outcome, Clinical Performance, Patient Perception and Cost-Time Efficiency of Implant-supported Single Crowns influenced by the Prosthetic Workflow – a Random-ized Clinical Trial in the Esthetic Zone (BASEC)
Wissenschaftlicher Titel
Esthetic Outcome, Clinical Performance, Patient Perception and Cost-Time Efficiency of Implant-supported Single Crowns influenced by the Prosthetic Workflow a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Esthetic Zone - Ceramic Esthetic (ICTRP)
Öffentlicher Titel
Esthetic Outcome, Clinical Performance, Patient Perception and Cost-Time Efficiency of Implant-supported Single Crowns influenced by the Prosthetic Workflow a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Esthetic Zone (ICTRP)
Untersuchte Krankheit(en)
Missing tooth, single tooth gap (ICTRP)
Untersuchte Intervention
Group 1: Using a zirconium dioxide healing abutment, a provisional phase with soft tissue conditioning following the dynamic compression technique, a customized CAD/CAM designed abutment made of zirconium dioxide and veneered with individualized hand- build up ceramic.
Group 2: Using a titanium healing abutment, no provisional phase and a direct finalization of the crown with a Vario Base Abutment using monolithic ceramic which is individualized by extrinsic staining.
Group 3: Using a CAD/CAM designed individual mucosa former made of zirconium dioxide for 3 months, no provisional phase, the crown is finalized with a customized CAD/CAM designed abutment made of zirconium dioxide and veneered with individualized hand- build up ceramic. (ICTRP)
Studientyp
interventional (ICTRP)
Studiendesign
Allocation: Randomized controlled study; Masking: Open (masking not used); Control: active; Assignment: parallel; Study design purpose: treatment (ICTRP)
Ein-/Ausschlusskriterien
Inclusion criteria: 1. Die Probanden mssen vor jeder studienbezogenen Handlung freiwillig die Einverstndniserklrung unterzeichnet haben.
2. Erfolgreich osseointegriertes Straumann-Einzelzahnimplantat auf Knochenniveau 4,1 mm (BL/BLT), das mindestens 8 Wochen nach der Zahnextraktion eingesetzt wurde
3. Implantatachse kompatibel mit transokklusaler Schraubenretention (Schraubenzugang palatinal der Inzisalkanten) (ICTRP)
Exclusion criteria: 1. Systemic disease that would interfere with dental implant therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, i.v. bisphosphonate intake)
2. Any contraindications for oral surgical procedures
3. History of local irradiation therapy in the head-neck area
4. Patients who smoke >10 cigarettes per day or tobacco equivalents or chew tobacco
5. Subjects who have undergone administration of any investigational device within 30 days of enrolment in the study
6. Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability
7. Physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
9. Existing implants in the adjacent position
10. Removable dentures in the opposing dentition
11. Patients with inadequate oral hygiene (Periodontal examination PGU > 2) or unmotivated for adequate home care
12. Lack of primary stability of the implant
13. Inappropriate implant position for a screw-retained restoration
14. Severe bruxing or clenching habits
Primäre und sekundäre Endpunkte
To compare the influence of the prosthetic workflow on the overall esthetic outcome: PES/WES index at baseline, 1, 3, and 5 years. (ICTRP)
Time (in min) and cost (in CHF) analysis of fabrication of final implant crowns
�Crestal bone level changes at the implant site (mesial and distal) between baseline and 1, 3, 5 years
�Implant survival rate at baseline, 1, 3, 5 years
�Mechanical complications / failures at baseline,1, 3, 5 years
�Technical complications / failures at baseline,1, 3, 5 years
�Plaque assessments on healing abutments
�Clinical Parameters: Examination of standard peri-implant soft tissue parameters (mod Pl, BOP, PD, KM) at six sites of each implant (except KM: only buccal) at baseline, 1, 3, 5 years
�PICI-Index after baseline, 1, 3, 5 years
�Patient questionnaires (PROMs Prothetik) after baseline, 1, 3, 5 years using numerical rating scale (NRS) and OHIP-G14 questionnaire
(ICTRP)
Registrierungsdatum
22.06.2023 (ICTRP)
Einschluss des ersten Teilnehmers
14.08.2024 (ICTRP)
Sekundäre Sponsoren
nicht verfügbar
Weitere Kontakte
Daniel Thoma, daniel.thoma@zzm.uzh.ch, +41 44 634 43 05, Zentrum fr Zahnmedizin, Klinik fr Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin (ICTRP)
Sekundäre IDs
nicht verfügbar
Angaben zur Verfügbarkeit von individuellen Teilnehmerdaten
No (ICTRP)
Weitere Informationen zur Studie
http://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032124 (ICTRP)
Ergebnisse der Studie
Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse
nicht verfügbar
Link zu den Ergebnissen im Primärregister
nicht verfügbar